Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Long focused on Russia, NATO widens gaze toward China

Published 12/04/2019, 08:08 PM
Updated 12/04/2019, 08:16 PM
Long focused on Russia, NATO widens gaze toward China

Long focused on Russia, NATO widens gaze toward China

By Phil Stewart and Robin Emmott
LONDON, Dec 4 (Reuters) - Seventy years since its Cold
War-era founding as a transatlantic alliance focused on Moscow,
NATO is expanding its gaze toward the increasingly muscular
challenge posed by China.
But it's unclear, even to diplomats within the 29-member
military alliance, whether NATO is up to the task -- especially
at a time of intense internal divisions and acrimony that were
on full display at this week's summit. The United States is leading the charge for a greater focus
on China and is confident in a receptive audience in much of
Europe, where concerns are mounting about Beijing's growing
economic leverage, in particular.
U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper, in an interview with
Reuters, said there was an increasing understanding in Europe
about the challenges posed by China's rapidly expanding military
might, which includes everything from hypersonic weaponry to
aircraft carriers.
"China is a strategic challenge for us and we need to get
ahead of that," Esper said.
"That doesn't mean that China right now is an enemy. But we
need to help shape that together as an alliance. And we need to
be prepared in case things do turn out in a way we prefer they
not."
In a sign of the NATO push, the allies will approve at the
summit a new strategy to monitor China's growing military
activity.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg noted in London that
China was the world's second-largest defense spender, after the
United States.
"It's not about moving NATO into the South China Sea, but
it's about taking into account the fact that China is coming to
closer to us," Stoltenberg said, pointing to Chinese activity in
the Arctic, Africa and heavy investments in European
infrastructure.
The United States, in particular, wants European allies to
ban equipment from Chinese telecoms equipment maker Huawei,
saying its gear could be used by Beijing for spying.
Huawei, which denies Washington's allegations, said in
October that half of the 65 commercial deals that it had signed
were with European customers building 5G mobile phone networks.

NATO'S NEXT ADVERSARY?
One NATO diplomat said there was broad agreement that China
was "part of our strategic environment" but cautioned about the
limits of European unity on the push.
"Some allies would be tempted to please Trump and present
China as NATO's next adversary, but most Europeans know this
does not represent their national interest," the diplomat said,
speaking on condition of anonymity.
Another diplomat cautioned that China would not become
NATO's adversary.
"China is not the new Russia. This is not about declaring
China as the new enemy," the diplomat said.
"China is the rising power of the 21st century."
Derek Chollet, a former senior Pentagon official during the
Obama administration, said European officials increasingly share
the U.S. view of China as a strategic challenge but he
questioned the extent to which Beijing would become a NATO
focus.
"No question there is an opportunity," said Chollet, who is
now at the German Marshall Fund think-tank.
"It is unlikely, however, to ever be a core NATO task."
Part of the China plan at NATO is based around seven
baseline requirements on which NATO allies must asses the risks.
These include the risks of consequences of Chinese ownership of
communications and NATO plans to restore communications in case
of disruption.
It also includes ensuring NATO has ownership of strategic
weapons and infrastructure and what NATO's maritime posture
should be vis-à-vis China.
The push comes amid broader strains within the alliance,
with a French president who calls it "brain dead," a Turkish
leader who is buying Russian weapons and an American president
who has described allies who spend too little on defense as
"delinquent."
Esper, in his comments to Reuters, played down the divisions
in NATO.
"I can't remember a time when there wasn't some degree of
disunity from one member or another. It's not unusual," Esper
said ahead of the talks in London.
"If it's a little heightened this time around, I think
(it's) because we're going through a transition ... to make sure
the alliance is focused on the future."

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.